Christianity, Colonialism, and the Crisis in Israel: A Critical Review of Faith Manipulated

An Authoritative Analysis by Francis John PhD, Editor and Publisher of TipsNews.info

The historical trajectory of Christianity reveals a painful paradox: a faith founded on principles of peace, love, and redemption has been systematically manipulated throughout centuries to justify conquest, colonization, and the subjugation of entire peoples. From the Roman Emperor Constantine’s fourth-century embrace of Christianity as a state religion—a move that transformed a pacifist movement into an instrument of imperial power—to the Crusades, colonialism, and now modern geopolitical conflicts, the holy bible has been weaponized to serve political agendas that contradict its core teachings. Today, we witness the latest manifestation of this historical pattern as Israeli legislators advance bills that would criminalize Christian speech, particularly expressions of faith in Jesus, under the guise of protecting Jewish religious identity.

This legislative effort, introduced by coalition members Moshe Gafni and Yaakov Asher, would impose prison sentences of one to two years for sharing Christian beliefs through the internet, media, or email, effectively criminalizing the very religious expression that Christianity represents. The irony is staggering: a religion that was itself born from Judaism and brought to the world through Jewish apostles is now facing legislative suppression in the very land where Christianity was founded. What kind of world are we living in when the descendants of those who first carried the Christian message are now seeking to silence it through the force of law?

(10)Arewa KuliKuli TV (@arewakulikulitv) | TikTok

The manipulation of scripture to justify political expansionism has reached alarming proportions, as evidenced by recent statements from U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee asserting a “biblical right” for Israel to control territory “from the Nile to the Euphrates”. The Higher Presidential Committee for Church Affairs in Palestine condemned this rhetoric as a “dangerous misuse of religion to justify occupation,” warning that such framing risks transforming a political conflict into a religious confrontation that threatens global peace and stability.

This represents a profound theological distortion, invoking sacred texts not for spiritual guidance but as a legal and political weapon to legitimize territorial expansion and the displacement of indigenous populations, both Muslim and Christian . The very same scriptures that speak of loving one’s neighbor, welcoming the stranger, and pursuing peace are being selectively quoted to support policies that do the exact opposite. Throughout history, from the Peasant’s War of 1525 when Martin Luther betrayed the oppressed by siding with the ruling elite who slaughtered them, to modern times, religious institutions have too often aligned with power rather than with justice . The words of Martin Luther King Jr. echo across the centuries: “The church must be reminded that it is not the master or the servant of the state, but rather the conscience of the state. It must be the guide and the critic of the state, and never its tool” .

The current situation facing Christians in Israel and the Palestinian territories reveals a disturbing pattern of escalating harassment, violence, and systemic marginalization that directly contradicts the values of religious freedom and pluralism. Auxiliary Bishop William Shomali of Jerusalem has documented a worsening crisis, with attacks against Christians in the West Bank “multiplying” and incidents no longer isolated but occurring across multiple locations, including intimidation by Israeli settlers through threats, physical aggression, and property damage.

In the Christian village of Taybeh, residents face repeated harassment including the burning of cars and attempts to prevent landowners from reaching their fields, while in Birzeit, settlers arrive “almost daily to intimidate individuals in their homes or workplaces” . Church property itself has become a target, with settlers attempting to occupy land belonging to a convent of nuns in Urtas and planting an Israeli flag at Shepherds’ Field in Beit Sahour despite clear deeds of ownership held by Christian families . These actions, combined with the proposed legislation criminalizing Christian speech, have contributed to a dramatic decline in the Palestinian Christian population from approximately 135,550 in 1945 to an estimated 45,000–50,000 today—a loss that threatens the very continuity of Christianity in its birthplace .

(10)Arewa KuliKuli TV (@arewakulikulitv) | TikTok

The theological framework underlying much of this tension is what scholars’ term “replacement theology” or “supersessionism”—the belief that the church has permanently replaced Israel in God’s plan, a view that ironically fuels both anti-Christian legislation and Christian Zionist expansionism from opposite directions. Replacement theology teaches that “the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Joseph are now fulfilled only through those who follow Jesus Christ since they alone are designated the true children of Abraham and Sarah,” effectively rendering the Jewish people irrelevant to God’s ongoing purposes. This theological error has historically provided cover for antisemitism, while simultaneously, its opposite—Christian Zionism—has been used to justify political agendas that ignore the rights and dignity of Palestinians, including Palestinian Christians who have lived continuously in the land for nearly two millennia.

The Apostle Paul explicitly rejected this theological framework in Romans 11, declaring that “God has not rejected His people whom He foreknew” and warning Gentile believers not to be “arrogant toward the branches” because “it is not you who supports the root, but the root supports you” . Yet today, both those who would suppress Christianity and those who would use it as a political bludgeon are ignoring Paul’s central insight: that God’s purposes encompass both Jews and Gentiles, and neither is called to dominate the other but rather to coexist in mutual respect and recognition.

Arewa KuliKuli TV (@arewakulikulitv) | TikTok

The question posed by the original inquiry— “Is this worth it?”—demands an honest reckoning with the human cost of religious manipulation across generations. According to comprehensive historical analysis, “the wars of religion” that supposedly defined European history were not actually religious wars in the simplistic sense we imagine, but rather state-building enterprises in which kings “justified attacks on rival nobles and efforts to consolidate their power by invoking the name of God”. The concept of “religion” as a separate, private sphere of human life emerged during this period, meaning that religion was not the cause of the wars but rather a result of them—a distinction with profound implications for how we understand contemporary conflicts.

The true cost has been measured in millions of lives lost, cultures destroyed, and communities torn apart by violence that masqueraded as holy but was, in reality, driven by the same greed, fear, and lust for power that motivate all human conflict. Research commissioned by the British Broadcasting Corporation concluded that “the 100 years of religious wars were rarely actually fought for religion at all,” but rather for nationalism, liberation, or self-protection, with religion serving as a convenient justification. When we recognize that most religious violence is, at its core, political violence wearing sacred clothing, we begin to understand that the real battle is not between faiths but between those who would use faith for domination and those who seek to reclaim it for justice, peace, and human dignity.

(10)Arewa KuliKuli TV (@arewakulikulitv) | TikTok

The generational imperative before us is to wake from the slumber of uncritical acceptance and recognize that we are living through a moment of profound decision about the future relationship between faith, politics, and human community. The pattern is unmistakable: Christianity was brought to many parts of the world through colonial violence, with missionaries often preceding or accompanying soldiers who conquered indigenous peoples in the name of both God and empire. The Bible was manipulated through selective translation, interpretive frameworks, and theological systems designed to justify the subjugation of African peoples during slavery, the displacement of Native Americans, and countless other atrocities committed in the name of Christian civilization. Now, in the land of Christianity’s birth, we see new efforts to use religious language to justify legislative suppression of Christian expression alongside physical harassment of Christian communities, all while claiming biblical authority for political expansionism.

This is not the first time such manipulation has occurred, and unless we act with intentional awareness, it will not be the last. The facts of history are clear: when religious institutions align with state power, they almost invariably become instruments of oppression rather than agents of liberation, betraying the very founders who were themselves persecuted by the religious-political establishments of their day. (10)Arewa KuliKuli TV (@arewakulikulitv) | TikTok

The path forward requires a radical reclamation of faith from those who would weaponize it, returning to the core ethical imperatives that transcend any particular political agenda. The original teachings of Jesus emphasized love of enemy, care for the marginalized, and the rejection of violence—principles that stand in direct opposition to the ways Christianity has been used throughout history. As Martin Luther King Jr. understood, drawing from both the prophetic tradition of the Hebrew scriptures and the nonviolent example of Jesus, the true role of the church is to be the conscience of the state, not its chaplain or its cheerleader. This means speaking truth to power regardless of political consequences, standing with the oppressed regardless of their religious identity, and refusing to allow sacred texts to be twisted into instruments of domination.

For Christians in Israel and Palestine, this means recognizing that their Palestinian Christian brothers and sisters are not enemies to be marginalized but fellow believers whose welfare is integral to the health of the entire body of Christ . For Jews, it means distinguishing between the legitimate desire for Jewish self-determination and the use of religious arguments to justify policies that violate the dignity and rights of non-Jewish citizens and residents . For Muslims, it means recognizing that the critique of religious manipulation applies equally to all faith traditions and that the path to peace lies in reclaiming the common ground of shared humanity rather than deepening divisions .

The question of whether religion divides us or unites us is ultimately not a question about religion itself but about how we choose to interpret, practice, and deploy it in our collective lives. The research is unequivocal: violence is not inherent to religion but arises when religious identity becomes fused with political, national, or ethnic identities in ways that create zero-sum conflicts where one group’s gain is perceived as another’s loss. The solution, then, is not to abandon faith—which for billions provides essential meaning, community, and moral guidance—but to resist the manipulation of faith for political ends and to reclaim the prophetic tradition that holds power accountable in the name of transcendent justice.

The same scriptures that have been used to justify slavery and conquest have also been used to inspire liberation movements, from the abolitionists who saw in Exodus the imperative to free the enslaved, to the civil rights marchers who sang “We Shall Overcome” on the streets of Selma. The future is not predetermined, and the trajectory of how religion will shape our world remains in our hands. We can continue down the path of division, manipulation, and violence that has marked so much of religious history, or we can choose a different way—one that honors the complexity of human identity, respects the dignity of all people, and refuses to let sacred texts become weapons.

(10)Arewa KuliKuli TV (@arewakulikulitv) | TikTok

Final Reflection

The generation alive today faces a choice that will echo through centuries: will we allow religion to remain a tool of division and domination, or will we reclaim it as a source of healing, justice, and reconciliation? The facts are clear: Christianity has been manipulated, the Bible has been twisted, and now legislative efforts threaten to suppress Christian expression in the land of its birth. But the same awareness that reveals this manipulation also empowers us to resist it. By recognizing the patterns of the past, we can refuse to repeat them. By standing with those who are marginalized—whether Palestinian Christians facing harassment, Israelis who value democracy over religious coercion, or any people whose dignity is violated in the name of faith—we can build a different future. The question is not whether religion will be part of our collective life, but whether it will be part of the problem or part of the solution. The answer depends on what we choose to do today.

Further Reading

• Billy Graham Evangelistic Association: “The Errors of Replacement Theology” 
• All Israel News: Analysis of Proposed Anti-Christian Legislation 
• Theopolis Institute: “The Myth of Religious Violence” 
• Catholic Herald: Palestinian Bishop Warns of Rising Attacks on Christians 
• ICEJ: Christian Zionism and Biblical Support for Israel