Teamgroup T-Force G50 SSD review: Fast enough and priced to move

Teamgroup’s T-Pressure G50 is an splendid mixture of real (if no longer high-shelf) efficiency and penny-pinching affordability. It’s a monumental worth for any individual who’s purchasing for a solid PCIe 4.0 force for day after day initiatives.

What are the Teamgroup T-Pressure G50’s ideas?

The Teamgroup T-Pressure G50 is a M.2, 2280 (22mm broad, 80mm long) NVMe PCIe 4.0 x4 wearing 176-layer 3D TLC NAND Flash ruled by a InnoGrit IG5220 controller. It has a bunch memory buffer (HMB) fabricate, that manner it uses your instrument’s memory rather than onboard DRAM as main cache.

The G50 comes with removable skinny graphene warmth-spreader (considered within the image above) that, besides serving to thermals, presents the module a sporty peep.

Teamgroup warranties the T-Pressure G50 for a rotund 5 years, mitigated by the 650 TBW (terabytes that will be written to the force) per 1TB of skill. When you occur to’re no longer acquainted, TBW is fancy the miles in an car warranty. The real looking TBW rating in this class is 600TBW, even supposing many fancy-priced QLC SSDs are easiest covered for 200 to 250 TBW.

Additional reading: Leer our roundup of the correct SSDs to learn about competing products.

How grand does the Teamgroup T-Pressure G50 rate?

I’ve always wished to intention a net situation with one note or single-phrase product critiques. In this case, that phrase will be “no longer very grand.” No longer very grand as in $50 for 512GB, $70 for 1TB, and easiest $120 for 2TB (and dazzling now, Amazon has them for even much less). Yowser, other folks! NVMe losing to easiest $60 per terabyte? That’s even more cost effective than the recently reviewed, and intensely real looking Kingston NV3.

How snappy is the Teamgroup T-Pressure G50?

The G50 no longer often jumped to the head of the PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD class. But with all due recognize to the gorgeous artwork of benchmarking, even essentially the most lazy pupil in this class is darn snappy. Subjectively, moreover for the 450GB write, which is heavily depending on the amount of NAND on board, you’d never be in an arena to expose most NVMe SSDs aside in exact-world employ.

That acknowledged, there are faster PCIe 4.0 drives available (at the side of the Compulsory P310 and Corsair MP600 Elite within the charts). Sequential throughput in CrystalDiksMark 8 became the G50’s weakest take a look at, if one may maybe maybe maybe in each effect 4GBps extinct.

The G50’s 4K numbers under CrystalDiskMark 8 were closer to those of the competition.

The G50 indisputably nudged in front of the rival Kingston NV3’s aggregate 48GB transfer time.

Having 2TB of NAND on the total lets in an HMB NVMe SSD similar to the T-Pressure G50 to put in writing our neat 450GB file in a short amount of time: 2 minutes, 17 seconds is bookin’.

Below you maybe can also ogle what happens when the G50 in the end runs out of cache. Most customers will infrequently reproduction a single 900GB file or abilities this narrate. This bustle is indicative of older TLC. Simplest QLC will write slower natively (sans caching of any form).

When you purchase the Teamgroup T-Pressure G50?

When you occur to’re no longer purchasing for every final ounce of on the total unnoticeable efficiency, the G50 is a noteworthy and extraordinarily real looking option in your PC or instrument — assuming, of direction, that your instrument supports HMB. The overwhelming majority attain.

That acknowledged, HMB SSDs will work with out reinforce, factual no longer virtually besides.

How we take a look at

Drive tests currently expend Windows 11, 64-bit working on an X790 (PCIe 4.0/5.0) motherboard/i5-12400 CPU combo with two Kingston Fury 32GB DDR5 4800MHz modules (64GB of memory complete). Each and each 20Gbps USB and Thunderbolt 4 are built-in to the wait on panel and Intel CPU/GPU graphics are veteran. The 48GB transfer tests expend an ImDisk RAM disk taking up 58GB of the 64GB of complete memory. The 450GB file is transferred from a 2TB Samsung 990 Pro which also runs the OS.

Each and each take a look at is performed on a newly formatted and TRIM’d force so the outcomes are optimal. Repeat that in extraordinary employ, as a force fills up, efficiency can also lower consequently of much less NAND for secondary caching, to boot to other components. This may maybe maybe maybe be much less of a ingredient with the present slice of SSDs with a long way faster leisurely-abilities NAND.

Caveat: The efficiency numbers proven be conscious easiest to the force we were shipped and to the skill examined. SSD efficiency can and can also differ by skill consequently of more or fewer chips to shotgun reads/writes across and the amount of NAND available for secondary caching. Vendors also every on occasion swap parts. When you occur to ever look for a neat discrepancy between the efficiency you abilities and that which we document, by all manner, allow us to know.

Creator: Jon L. Jacobi, Freelance contributor