Kubernetes and storage in the enterprise: What the analysts say
We talk to analysts about Kubernetes adoption within the project, how out of date it is, deployment challenges and key barriers to enterprises that are looking out out for to proceed cloud-native with containers
By
-
Stephen Pritchard
Published: 09 Aug 2024
Kubernetes and containerised functions are rising as we disclose all over enterprises. Even though Kubernetes has been spherical for additional than 10 years, it’s now predicted to alter correct into a mainstream share of IT structure as organisations recognize to ticket extra exercise of cloud-native functions.
But rob-up of Kubernetes – aka K8s – and storage and records protection in explicit, pose some challenges for IT organisations. Even though containers had been at the starting up envisaged as stateless, project functions are for the most share stateful. They must store records, and that records wishes to be protected. Moreover, Kubernetes-basically based solely functions must be share of any project wretchedness recovery notion.
Here, we rob soundings from industry analysts regarding the possibilities for Kubernetes within the project, its readiness for stateful exercise situations, and what that potential for IT groups.
How neatly-liked is Kubernetes within the project?
There is absolute confidence that Kubernetes adoption is rising, especially in greater organisations, however analyst numbers vary, and there are solutions that records on the paddle for food for Kubernetes would possibly well overtake its proper-world rob-up.
Gartner, as an illustration, believes decrease than half of global organisations ran containerised functions in manufacturing in 2023, however that 95% of global organisations will accomplish so by 2029. Moreover, 35% of project functions will proceed in containers – extra than double this day’s figures – and 80% of industrial intention will be offered in a containerised version.
At ESG, analyst Simon Robinson cites a 2023 research ogle that found 67% of corporations out of date containers for manufacturing apps. “Nearly about all of the relaxation are planning to accomplish so within the long proceed,” he says.
On the storage facet, again in 2023, forty five% of organisations out of date power storage with manufacturing apps, and 37% ran test and fashion with storage. But not all analysts are as obvious.
Be taught by CCS Insight, sponsored by Red Hat, found that wait on in 2021, 90% of respondents had been attracted to the abilities. “Gorgeous over 70% [were] getting prepared to deploy into manufacturing or working on proof-of-notion projects,” explains Bola Rotibi, CCS’s chief of project research. “My prediction is that its adoption will continue, however not at this form of rapid rate as implied by some within the market.
“Some surveys keep Kubernetes’ share of the container abilities market at spherical 24%, with the US being considered because the finest particular person,” she says. “Nonetheless, no topic the positivity spherical Kubernetes adoption charges at KubeCon in March this 365 days, there was so a lot of dialogue spherical the realities of Kubernetes adoption that it is not as neatly-liked as some industry stories would possibly also honest counsel.”
Rotibi highlighted one organisation that has nearly 20 instances as many VMs because it has Kubernetes-basically based solely workloads as a benchmark for how things are in some situations.
What are the barriers to Kubernetes deployment?
The barriers to Kubernetes rob-up will infrequently near as a surprise. Containers are complex, and would possibly well even be advanced to proceed to manufacturing.
Gartner analysts Arun Chandrasekaran and Wataru Katsurashima cite “a lack of enough abilities and out of date DevOps practices to operationalise and succeed with sizable-scale manufacturing deployments”. Here is no topic a rising quantity of exercise situations.
But it is the complexity of Kubernetes and the differ of so a lot of systems it would possibly perchance well even be deployed that mute effect it wait on. It’s also price noting that stateful Kubernetes deployments are mute a minute less out of date than the long-established, stateless notion.
“In our research, we’ve considered complexity challenges being the #1 purpose organisations fight to adopt cloud-native practices, at the side of Kubernetes,” says Jon Collins, vice-president of engagement at analyst GigaOm. “There’s a mushy middle, as functions migrate from single-stack legacy, through virtualised and grab-and-shift cloud, to architectures and approaches that are rooted in cloud solutions.”
He provides that complexity management is a problem by the exercise of scaling up any cloud-native functions, with a lack of readability spherical containerised functions that can enhance security and quite so a lot of dangers.
“Total, the deployment/management route of wishes to simplify, especially when working at scale,” says ESG’s Robinson. “Kubernetes is mute gorgeous complex. Moreover, in greater organisations, there are veritably many Kubernetes groups deploying apps, veritably the exercise of assorted tools and methodologies, veritably in a differ of places. Here is inefficient and introduces likelihood for the organisation.”
For IT leaders, the reveal is to sq. the circle of working complex, project workflows in a machine designed to be stateless and accumulate a genuinely gentle handy resource footprint.
Kubernetes, storage and records protection
Data storage remains an effect apart the effect apart organisations fight with Kubernetes. Chronic storage, backup and recovery mute genuinely feel devour they accumulate got been grafted onto the Kubernetes mission.
“One total misconception about Kubernetes is the foundation that functions that proceed on the platform must mute be designed to be stateless,” reveal Gartner analysts Fintan Quinn and Tony Iams. “In actuality, most functions and projects that proceed on a Kubernetes cluster will sooner or later must store or collect admission to records.”
Stateful functions and workloads exercise power volumes (PVs) to store records, with the PV ready to retain records even though the pod the exercise of it stops working. But, as Quinn and Iams counsel, this wants cautious collect to effect a ways flung from records loss.
“For storage particularly, there are a differ of challenges, however the main ones are managing quality of carrier, managing all over hybrid environments, compliance, impress and performance,” says Robinson. “Whereas you fan the flames of several thousand containers as we disclose, you need so a lot of hasty storage!”
By map of backup and recovery, chief files officers must guarantee Kubernetes environments are in actual fact share of the backup or wretchedness recovery notion. Usually, they’re not.
“Operating stateful workloads interior your Kubernetes cluster is k, however it’s necessary to adapt backup and recovery processes to consist of application records,” reveal Quinn and Iams.
At CCS Insight, Rotibi capabilities out that better “monitoring, observability and visibility” is wanted in Kubernetes environments. Simplifying deployment and management would possibly also ticket Kubernetes extra sturdy.
And over time, we are likely to acknowledge better enhance for Kubernetes in primitive backup and recovery tools, as neatly as extra sturdy backup alternate strategies in Kubernetes management environments.
“It’s mute early days, however the main fashion is rising adoption of stateful apps,” says Robinson. “Data wants storing and maintaining powerful devour for new apps. Here is share of the ‘shift left’ fashion to collect extra new project records services and products baked into the device earlier.”
Learn extra on Containers and storage
-
Rakuten targets sizable edge deployments with Symworld Cloud
By: Yann Serra
-
Container storage platforms: Large six map starts to align
By: Antony Adshead
-
Pure targets at near naked metal I/O with Portworx PX-Quick
By: Antony Adshead
-
Kubernetes backup products and 10 key players
By: Stephen Pritchard