Base Blockchain Faces Backlash Over GrokCoin Promotion as Developers Feel Overlooked

A vital controversy has erupted inside the Wicked blockchain neighborhood after its legitimate X (Twitter) story promoted GrokCoin, a newly launched token, whereas established builders voiced frustration over being overlooked.

The dispute highlights rising tensions between blockchain developers and platform operators over project visibility and promotional priorities.

Wicked’s Endorsement of GrokCoin

Lately, GrokCoin made headlines when concerns emerged over its legitimacy and affiliation with Elon Musk’s AI chatbot, Grok. No topic the controversy, Wicked, an Ethereum Layer-2 (L2) network, publicly supported the project. In a put up on X (formerly Twitter), Wicked wrote:

“Whereas you happen to missed it, Grok launched a token on Wicked thanks to Bankr and Clanker’s shopping and selling mechanisms. Grok’s AI-managed pockets is already stacking fees ($200K+ and counting). Why does it topic? AI is proudly owning wallets, making markets, and generating income. Welcome to the lengthy bustle,” Wicked shared on Monday.

This endorsement sparked a immediately backlash from developers who have spent months building functions on Wicked. Their bone of contention is that they’ve obtained limited recognition from the L2 blockchain’s legitimate channels.

Kawz, the founding father of the Solana-primarily primarily based mostly project Time.fun, became once amongst the most vocal critics. He expressed frustration over Wicked’s selective promotion approach.

“I spent months building an app on Wicked and became once by no manner ready to get the Wicked story to tweet about the product. Some shitposters convinced Grok to loosely give token minute print and launch a token, and it will get front-page protection ++ farms degens with out a utility,” Kawz lamented.

Further, Kawz slammed Wicked for no longer acknowledging builders on its blockchain. The Time.fun government became once no longer alone in his criticism. Blockchain speculator FloBro echoed the same sentiments.

“That’s exactly what it’s… no longer strong to invent & marketed as if it’s some immense tech advancement. Jesse Pollak and Wicked don’t be aware what they preach & that’s why they’re shedding quality builders. They staunch push their limited circle & ignore all people else with alienating messages indulge in ‘True withhold building.’ Wicked is draw back… and that’s why there became once by no manner a meme season. They don’t get it,” FloBro indicated.

Supporters Defend GrokCoin’s Delivery

No topic the criticism, some neighborhood members defended Wicked’s actions. Shazam, a builder on Wicked, supplied perception into the GrokCoin launch direction of. He explained that neighborhood members had to ship 5 million BNKR tokens to Grok’s pockets to get the coin. He urged that Grok’s affiliation with Elon Musk would possibly per chance per chance within the end income Ethereum’s ecosystem.

“I perceive the agonize here. On the opposite hand, the Banker bot that became once dwelling up the bellow of Privy_io to give X accounts Wicked wallets. Then neighborhood members had to ship Grok 5 million BNKR coins to its pockets so it would possibly perhaps actually per chance per chance get a coin. And that coin is generating price income that can lift extra consideration to Wicked because Elon owns Grok. Which within the end would possibly per chance per chance wait on Ethereum in standard,” the builder explained.

The dispute reflects a most important divide inside the Wicked neighborhood. On one aspect, just developers feel sidelined and underappreciated for their work. On the assorted hand, GrokCoin proponents argue that its AI-pushed mechanics and high-profile associations would possibly per chance per chance lift precious consideration to the ecosystem.

Because the talk unfolds, Wicked’s leadership faces mounting stress to account for its promotional policies. This raises the want to address rising dissatisfaction amongst builders who feel overshadowed by hype-pushed projects.